Four jurors who each look at one thing only, and a judge who decides what actually matters. Together they give you the feedback a room of experienced founders would - without the politeness.
01
Early-stage investor
“Is the market big enough for what you want, and what stops someone copying you in three months?”
02
Your target customer, simulated
“Would I actually switch from what I use today - and pay your price for it?”
03
Serial founder
“Can you build this with your skills, hours and budget? Where do the first 100 customers come from?”
04
Devil's advocate
“Why hasn't this worked before, and which assumption makes the whole thing collapse?”
Put four experts in one room and they converge on a safe, balanced answer. Kept apart, each goes deep on their own angle - and disagreements surface instead of getting smoothed over. That's what the judge needs.
has the final word
The jurors give evidence. The judge gives the verdict. He reads every review, your interview and the market research, then rules:
Every important concern gets a ruling and a reason - including concerns built on assumptions you never made.
Three positive reviews don't cancel out one real deal-breaker. One fatal flaw decides the case.
If you proposed a fix for a risk, the judge says whether it holds - specifically.
Untested isn't fatal, it's a test. Every verdict states how confident it is and why.